Flexible Support Theory Handbook
The Theory handbook collects all the information used to be able to use and understand the underlying calculations with regards to Flexible Support.
Figure 1. Excessive schematic representation of a floor slab supported on flexible beams. (F. Lagerström, 2016)
Calculation of stresses in hollowcore cross sections
The aim with calculating these stresses is to avoid any cracking within the hollowcore cross sections. There are several different approaches to this, explained in FIB Bulletin 6 and the Finnish Code Card 18. There is also another approach described by T. Roggendorf in his PhD Thesis Zum Tragverhalten von Spannbeton-Fertigdecken bei biegeweicher Lagerung, Aachen Technische Hochschule (2010).
Approach | Supported by StruSoft Flexible Support |
---|---|
FIB Bulletin 6 | |
Code Card 18 | |
Roggendorf, 2010 |
Calculation principles
The calculation uses stiffnesses of the beam, hollowcore, joint concrete, and screed to calculate the deflection of the beam, causing the stresses within the concrete cross section of the hollowcore.
Figure 2. Picture of the shear flow and shear force of the hollowcore cross section (FIB Bulletin 6)
Properties of different regions
Beam
Text
Hollowcore
Text
Core fillings
Core fillings are ignored in the calculation of the stiffness of the composite beam.
They are however considered with the βf-factor.
Slab thickness [mm] | 200 | 265 | 320 | 400 |
Filling length < 50 mm | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Filling length at least equal to the depth of the void (hc). All voids filled | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Table 3.2 βf-factor (FIB Bulletin 6)
Figure x. Distance hc.
Joint concrete
Text
Topping on beam
Case | Visualization | Properties |
Beam web is lower than hollowcore | ||
Beam web is higher than hollowcore, but not higher than hollowcore and topping | ||
Beam web is higher than hollowcore and topping |
Table x. Properties of different cases of topping
Figure x. Definition of bweb, hweb, bjoint, hhc, htopping and bsupport.
Topping on hollowcore
Text